Here are my notes from a presentation by Prof. Denise Wood on developing a research proposal for projects looking at T&L.
Local evidence of successful projects is important before applying for larger grants. Collaborative teamwork is a great way to build ideas and test concepts. Local resources help you get started and build a track record. Generating pilot data helps to begin publishing. When panels review research proposals, your previous experience in obtaining funding and successful proposals is highly emphasised.
Why are you undertaking the study? Knowing your goals will justify your design decisions. What are your goals:
- Intellectual / theoretical
Writing proposals is closely tied to career trajectory
How are you using research and research projects to improve your teaching practice?
What conceptual framework are you using:
- Research paradigm
- Experiential knowledge
- Existing theory and research
- Pilot and exploratory studies
Interested in addressing a gap, bringing in personal reflections that guide and influence the research. If you only think of your conceptual framework as a literature review, then you limit the scope of your research to what others have done.
- What is the relationship between the goals and the conceptual framework?
- Help to guide the actual research design / methods
- Used to connect the problem and practical concerns
- Should be specific and focused on the study
- Need to allow flexibility to reveal unanticipated phenomena (if the questions are too focused you may miss emergent ideas)
- Need to avoid inherent assumptions as they bias the study
Find a balance in the number of questions (3-4 is usually adequate)
Begin with divergent thinking to allow yourself space to explore many possibilities. Mind mapping is useful to identify high-level ideas. Begin reading broadly and then begin narrowing the focus. You can’t answer all possible questions in one study.
Try to avoid getting too caught up in the details of the research methods. Only use methods that you understand.
Note that you will be informed by your own epistemological understanding of what knowledge is and how we come to know. Your methods (quantitative, qualitative or mixed methods) will most likely mirror your understanding of how we come to know. This will in turn guide how you sample, gather and analyse data.
For local studies, it’s OK to use a pilot within a classroom. Use this to identify a single context. Larger proposals would be better to expand the scope of the study and test the outcome of the pilot. On the basis of the smaller studies, you can make an argument for the larger study. Think laterally about how you can collect data.
- Validity: How might you be wrong?
- Bias (what assumptions do you bring with you? Results and interpretation distorted by your own values and preconceptions)
- Reactivity (quantitative researcher may try to control for the effect of the researcher influence; qualitative researcher looks at how they actually influence the outcomes)
How do you reduce bias and reactivity?
- Studies should be intensive and long-term (not the same as longitudinal study)
- Gather rich, thick data (less likely to get from surveys / questionnaires; rather use interviews or focus groups)
- Respondent validation of outcomes (is what you heard the same as what they meant?)
- Identifying discrepant cases or evidence (you should take outliers into account, but identify and reflect on them, not necessarily include in the main data and suggest reasons for the discrepancy)
- Comparative data (look at different contexts and populations)
- Identify a funding body
- Objectives of the funding body
- Use the guidelines that the funding body provides
- Previous funded research and see what has been accepted and / or rejected
- Links with existing research that the body is involved with
- Evidence of value, need and benefits (institutional, local, national, international)
- Background / conceptual framework
- Evaluation strategies are valued in educational research
- Engaged dissemination whereby you share your results as you go, using a variety of methods, including publications, conference presentations, social media and workshops
- Budget: must meet funding body requirements, realistic, value for money, justify costs
- Milestones: linked to objectives and outcomes
- Researcher capabilities: ensure you can deliver what you say you can, track record, previous collaboration, strategic, roles and responsibilities, realistic within workload
Try to model your proposal on successful projects. Learn from the mistakes of others. Sit down with a colleague and ask for constructive feedback.
Explicitly make reference to important and contextually relevant policy documents.
Identify how your research is going to create systemic change.
How are you going to evaluate your process and outcomes?
- Formative: should be ongoing and used to modify project
- Summative: can be broad and can go beyond the stated outcomes
Design-based research: can use milestones that are linked to formative evaluation. Identify problems early on and adapt quickly.
How are you going to convince the funding body that the people you’re collaborating with are adding value to the project? You must justify the presence of every team member and highlight how they will contribute.
How are you plugging the holes that funding assessors are going to be looking for?
Differentiate between deliverables (the tangible products that will come from the project) and outcomes (the achievement of stated aims and objectives).
This was originally posted at /usr/space.